Divine essay impassibility in philosophical theology

Apr 10th, By Bryan Cross Category:

Divine essay impassibility in philosophical theology

Eastern Orthodox theology is the theology particular to the Eastern Orthodox Church (officially the Orthodox Catholic Church).It is characterized by monotheistic Trinitarianism, belief in the Incarnation of the essentially divine Logos or only-begotten Son of God, a balancing of cataphatic theology with apophatic theology, a hermeneutic defined by a polyvalent Sacred Tradition, a concretely. Buy Divine Impassibility: An Essay in Philosophical Theology Reprint by Richard E. Creel (ISBN: ) from Amazon's Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders. It has been about fifty years since the topic of divine impassibility was the subject of book-length philosophical treatments in English. In recent years process and analytic philosophers have returned this issue to the forefront of professional attention. Divine Impassibility traces the issue of 3/5.

The Eastern Orthodox Church considers itself to be the one, holy, catholic and apostolic church established by Christ and his apostles. For the early years of the church, much of what was conveyed to its members was in the form of oral teachings.

Within a very short period of time traditions were established to reinforce these teachings. The Eastern Orthodox Church asserts to have been very careful in preserving these traditions.

When questions of belief or new concepts arise, the Church always refers back to the primitive faith.

Divine essay impassibility in philosophical theology

Eastern Orthodox see the Bible as a collection of inspired texts that sprang out of this tradition, not the other way around; and the choices made in forming the New Testament as having come from comparison with already firmly established faith.

The Bible has come to be a very important part of " Tradition ", but not the only part.

Catholic and Reformed Conceptions of the Atonement

Likewise, the Eastern Orthodox Church has always recognized the gradual development in the complexity of the articulation of the Church's teachings.

It does not, however, believe that truth changes and therefore always supports its previous beliefs all the way back to what it holds to be the direct teachings from the Apostles. The Church also understands that not everything is perfectly clear; therefore, it has always accepted a fair amount of contention about certain issues, arguments about certain points, as something that will always be present within the Church.

It is this contention which, through time, clarifies the truth. The Church sees this as the action of the Holy Spirit on history to manifest truth to man. The Church is unwavering in upholding its dogmatic teachings, but does not insist upon those matters of faith which have not been specifically defined.

The Eastern Orthodox believe that there must always be room for mystery when speaking of God. Individuals are permitted to hold theologoumena private theological opinions so long as they do not contradict traditional Eastern Orthodox teaching.

Sometimes, various Holy Fathers may have contradictory opinions about a certain question, and where no consensus exists, the individual is free to follow his or her conscience.

Tradition also includes the Nicene Creedthe decrees of the Seven Ecumenical Councilsthe writings of the Church Fathersas well as Eastern Orthodox laws canonsliturgical books and iconsetc. In defense of extrabiblical tradition, the Eastern Orthodox Church quotes Paul: The Eastern Orthodox Church also believes that the Holy Spirit works through history to manifest truth to the Church, and that He weeds out falsehood in order that the Truth may be recognised more fully.

Consensus of the Fathers[ edit ] See also: Theoria and Hesychasm Eastern Orthodoxy interprets truth based on three witnesses: The consensus of the Church over time defines its catholicity —that which is believed at all times by the entire Church.

Vincent of Lerinswrote in his Commonitoria ADthat Church doctrine, like the human body, develops over time while still keeping its original identity: Even those considered to be authentic "Fathers" may have some theological opinions that are not universally shared, but are not thereby considered heretical.


Some Holy Fathers have even made statements that were later defined as heretical, but their mistakes do not exclude them from position of authority heresy is a sin of pride ; unintended error does not make one a heretic, only the refusal to accept a dogma which has been defined by the church.

Thus an Eastern Orthodox Christian is not bound to agree with every opinion of every Father, but rather with the consensus of the Fathers, and then only on those matters about which the church is dogmatic.

Some of the greatest theologians in the history of the church come from the 4th century, including the Cappadocian Fathers and the Three Hierarchs.

However, the Eastern Orthodox do not consider the " Patristic era " to be a thing of the past, but that it continues in an unbroken succession of enlightened teachers i. Scripture[ edit ] A page from a rare Georgian Bible, A. D, depicting the Raising of Lazarus. Many modern Christians approach the Bible and its interpretation as the sole authority to the establishment of their beliefs concerning the world and their salvation.

From the Eastern Orthodox point of view, the Bible represents those texts approved by the church for the purpose of conveying the most important parts of what it already believes.

God's Law: Universal Truth According to Religious Sovereign Citizens -- Sightings

The Church more or less accepted the preexisting Greek Septuagint version of Hebrew Scriptures as handed down to them from the Jews; but the New Testament texts were written to members or congregations of the Church which already existed.

These texts were not universally considered canonical until the church reviewed, edited, accepted and ratified them in AD. The Greeks, having a highly sophisticated and philosophical language, have always understood that certain sections of Scripture, while containing moral lessons and complex truth, do not necessarily have to be interpreted literally.

The Eastern Orthodox also understand that a particular passage may be interpreted on many different levels simultaneously. However, interpretation is not a matter of personal opinion 2 Peter 1: For this reason, Eastern Orthodox depend upon the consensus of the Holy Fathers to provide a trustworthy guide to the accurate interpretation of Scripture.

Divine essay impassibility in philosophical theology

A large portion of the Daily Office is made up of either direct portions of scripture Psalmslections or allusions to scriptural passages or themes hymnography such as that contained in the OctoechosTriodionPentecostarionetc. The entire Psalter is read in the course of a week twice during Great Lent.A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology Phillip Cary, Editor.

Pro Ecclesia is the theology journal of the Center for Catholic and Evangelical vetconnexx.com publishes academically rigorous articles on biblical, liturgical, historical and doctrinal topics, aiming to serve the church (and thus be pro ecclesia), promote its ecumenical unity (and thus be catholic) and speak the truth about the.

Well, Divine Impassibility An Essay In Philosophical Theology is a cd that has various characteristic later than others.

Political theology - Wikipedia

You could not should know which the author is, how well-known the job is. It has been about fifty years since the topic of divine impassibility was the subject of book-length philosophical treatments in English. In recent years process .

The item Divine impassibility: an essay in philosophical theology, Richard E. Creel. --represents a specific, individual, material embodiment of a distinct intellectual or artistic creation found in University of Manitoba Libraries.

God Without Passions: A Reader [Samuel Renihan] on vetconnexx.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. The primary purpose of the material presented in this book is to familiarize the reader with sixteenth- and seventeenth-century English language sources pertinent to the doctrine of divine impassibility.

It has been about fifty years since the topic of divine impassibility was the subject of book-length philosophical treatments in English. In recent years process and analytic philosophers have returned this issue to the forefront of professional attention.

The Temporary Autonomous Zone